Memory is a mine field - by Virginia Pérez-Ratton
Wednesday, December 26th, 2007
Ernesto Salmerón was two years old when the triumphant “muchachos” entered Managua and thirteen when the Sandinistas lost the elections of 1990. He is a “cachorro” .
The Auras of War project, of Nicaraguan artist Ernesto Salmerón, was initiated ten years ago, in 1996, while the artist still lived in Colombia and was studying Social Communication. His intention was to document the “Nicaraguan revolutionary public space”, a space situated in the memory of a possible future, an utopia, one for which he had been prepared, in which he was to participate. However, we could say that the artist ends up assuming the position of a chronicler, recording instead the disappearance of that revolutionary space, witnessing the fading of hope in the wake of general indifference, although paradoxically continuing to invoke utopia even in the horror of post war. And so, voluntarily and consciously he surrenders to the traps of memory and the dangers of reminiscence as well as of oblivion. His final return to Nicaragua in 2003 is preceded by several visits on a specific date: the 19th of July. From these occasions emerges initially a series of portraits realised over several years on that date, the anniversary of the Sandinista revolution. However, these photos are nothing of a celebration: Salmerón considers them as an expression of his own “outrage in front of the present indifference”. They constitute a powerful essay that would have not been possible without the collaboration and complicity of the participants in the concentration at the plaza – these images are a sad metaphor of lost solidarity.
Salmerón’s first videos, of the series “29 Documents about the Revideolution in Nicaragua”, appear around 2002, and he founds E.V.I.L a bit later, the Latin American Video Army”, an independent video production project, organising workshops and bombarding through the web. The Documents 1/29, 2/29 and 3/29 were produced using newsreel and visual archive material of the recent Nicaraguan history, inserting references and cuts in an apparently arbitrary way, to hinder its understanding, as an analogy to the misinformation effect around the pre- and most of all the post – revolutionary process.
The memory of the Sandinista revolution is sifted through a series of political sieves, both temporal and contextual ones; it is the incomplete reminiscence of an aborted process, and a life situation that ends by destabilising the very existence of the artist as a “puppy of the revolution” – Salmerón was brought up to defend it but never got to apprehend it. In a way this work also questions and reasserts at the same time his national belonging as a “son of Sandino”. But of which Sandino? Just as Simón Bolívar, José Martí, Garibaldi and most of the historical figures that fought for a particular idea in specific circumstances in time and space, the figure of Sandino has been trampled and manipulated by posterity, and, as with others, been attributed ideologies and vocations according to political intentions of the moment, but that were rarely part of the original struggles. Where is Sandino? Is it the trace, the peeling image in “The Wall” that Ernesto Salmerón has taken to Venice?
In the beginning of “Tiempo Pasado” , an essay by Argentine scholar Beatriz Sarlo, the author cites Susan Sontag, in relation to memory and tought, when the latter insists on importance of understanding in the face of only remembering, while at the same time, in order to understand it is necessary to remember. Sarlo’s approach to the topic seems to put forth the notion that memory is not intangible, and as a response to this quite transgressing idea, the Costa Rican historian Victor Hugo Acuña noted that the past would be constituted then by a series of “objets trouvés”… would these be those that support, that assert memory and make it tangible? I am taken by this when approaching the project of “Sandino’s Wall”, that is, the recuperation of a fragment of adobe wall with a graffiti from the 80’s, and its following itinerance from Granada, Nicaragua to Managua, then to El Salvador, and now to the Arsenale in Venice. When preparing the loan form for the 2007 biennale, the artist asked himself what kind of work he was presenting: an installation, an action, a happening, social sculpture? Following Acuña’s idea, it would seem that this piece could be defined rather as a succession of found objects – the graffiti on the wall, the extracted adobe fragment, the IFA military truck, part of a donation of the German Democratic Republic to Nicaragua during the same period, now recycled as a commercial vehicle, and finally “The Wall” in the back of the truck, showing a blurred graffiti of Sandino that crumbles irremissibly in time, guarded by two demobilised, mutilated ex-militia members, a former Contra and a Sandinista soldier: this “macro-objet trouvé composé” becomes then a kind of tragic military funeral caravan for Sandino, betrayed once again by his own people. And as the found object assumes a specific meaning by the very fact of entering the space of art, so this caravan awakens the memory of a people, and maybe through an analogy with the impossible, in a country immersed in pre-modernity, it confers “life to the hope of a positive collective thinking, a thought that (the artist) would like to see transcend the “national” to touch a larger sympathy base, the human one”

What is Salmerón aiming at with this piece? The artist remains painfully aware of the impossibility of changing history, which will continue its course with or without him. Although this piece functions by itself as a desire to recuperate the utopia of survival, and through the presence of two guards, formerly set against each other around 25 years ago, would seem to propose an encounter of opponents, it also dramatically puts forth the consequences of wars and military conflicts, which inevitably cause misery and abandonment of the dispossessed, whether they belong to the winners or the losers. However, instead of considering common misery as the sole meeting space, this is a tangible testimony that reaffirms the capacity of a more recent memory. Attached to the complex Nicaraguan context, it transforms itself into a work of art within the very process the artist has lived as a document maker of personal experiences in front of the paradox, the absurd, the demobilised ones and the tensions between them, and is an austere but compelling register of a hallucinated journey on the central American roads. Auras of War, an on-going project, is a deep and complex realisation that questions the Manichean interpretation of a unending historical process, and a first step in the re-building of a fragmented memory, an open proposal that takes the risk of incompletion, that assumes its many silences, its many absences, its many interrogations.
Virginia Pérez-Ratton, may 2007















